Argue: Are Cultural or Economic Explanations More Convincing in Explaining the R

Argue: Are Cultural or Economic Explanations More Convincing in Explaining the Rise of Populism? Case study approach: case study Greece. start off with a broader discussion – how significant the debate is over socio-economic vs. cultural drivers of populism are. In Greece, obviously, the broad economic upheaval of the post-2008 crisis period has provoked a lot of discussion about, say, the EU, and may have contributed to the rise of populist forces. But it was arguably the political consequences of that upheaval that mattered most to people and concern about ’Northern Europe’ and ‘unelected bureaucrats like the IMF and ECB imposing austerity decisions on the Greek state. This obviously suggests a cultural-political dimension that is bound up with, but also distinct from, purely economic concerns. Moreover, is there variation within society as to who votes for populist groups (see i.e., https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/d99766f4-40d7-4f2d-b5c5-68543ff1ac03.pdf)? And how did the wider economic crisis in Greece communicate itself on to people at an individual level – was it perceptions of a crisis that mattered, or concern that others would be impacted by that crisis, rather than experiencing economic hardship themselves which pushed people towards populism? It would likewise be interesting to know about the situation pre-2008 – was there already a populist movement before the financial crisis (the history of Syriza for instance can be traced back to the early 2000s) Make use of primary and secondary sources.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *