If you were asked to recommend a legal business structure for someone’s business

If you were asked to recommend a legal business
structure for someone’s business, do you feel equipped with the
knowledge to provide sound advice? The person asking you would want to
know the benefits and drawbacks of each structure and be able to
determine which one fits the need. They also would want to understand
any legal considerations involved and the steps it would take to create
the structure.For
this Assignment, you will have a chance to provide that recommendation
by assuming the role of a junior legal research team member at XYZ
Corporation. The Company has been asked to review several business
scenarios for clients regarding possible business structures. You have
been given the task of gathering some introductory information on the
topic, as well as producing a report that reviews the clients’ options
for legal structures for their new companies.To prepare for this Assignment:Review the Learning Resources and take into consideration how
different business owners will have a variety of wants and needs when
deciding upon a legal business structure. Try to anticipate those needs.
Refer to the Academic Writing Expectations for 2000/3000-Level Courses as you compose your Assignment.
Submit your report containing
recommendations for appropriate legal structures for the five clients’
business types. For each scenario, address the following in your report:
Choose which type of business structure would be most appropriate for the situation.
List pros and cons of the recommended structure.
List the steps required for creating this type of business structure.
Include legal considerations and examples of related legal issues,
including personal liability and taxes, as well as profit distribution,
if applicable.
Scenario 1Karen and Alex have worked together to create a
concept to form a website development company. To do this, they have
asked three associates to invest their own money in the business in
return for receiving a percentage of the profits. The three investors
will not need to be involved in any of the day-to-day management or
conducting of business in the proposed company. (225–300 words, 3–4
paragraphs)Scenario 2A few years ago, Anika started a skateboard
company called Wheels Up and she has run it as a sole proprietorship.
Wheels Up has operated successfully, creating a sizable workforce and
management team; however, a market opportunity has surfaced that could
create significant and sustainable growth. Anika wants to change the
structure of her business. She is in negotiations with venture
capitalists who are interested in investing in the company. She also has
two employees, Sandra and Geoff, who are so integral to the company
that she wishes they had more of a stake in it. (225–300 words, 3–4
paragraphs)Scenario 3George would like to start a landscaping
business and call it Landscaping by George. The business would require
the use of heavy equipment, a large truck with a hydraulic lift, and an
open trailer. Because of that, he is fearful of causing an accident and
getting sued. He is mainly concerned about reducing the risk of losing
his house and other personal assets because of something that happens
with the business. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)Scenario 4Jose has started a website where he sells
products that he designs and produces himself, such as T-shirts, coffee
mugs, bumper stickers, and other similar items. He wants to create a
business based off this website and is hoping to do so in the least
complicated way possible. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)Scenario 5Deborah owns a bakery that is best known for her
specialty cupcakes. Her most important ingredients are the gourmet
chocolates Theo produces in his candy shop. They would like to form a
business structure together that helps them to market both of their
brands and make consumers aware of the importance of the relationship of
their products. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)
Requirements: 7-8 pages

THE CASE OF THE DRIVER WHO HAD ONE TOO MANYTom was insured under a life insuranc

THE CASE OF THE DRIVER WHO HAD ONE TOO MANYTom was insured under a life insurance contract policy that excluded death due to suicide. The policy had a face amount of $1 million. Two weeks after taking out the policy, Tom stopped at a local bar to have a “few” as he had gotten a promotion that day and his family was depending on that promotion to save their home. Tom left the bar, driving while intoxicated. He was speeding and lost control of his car which hit a utility pole. He was killed immediately. There was no one else involved in the accident. The weather was clear and the road was in good shape and well lighted. Tom’s insurance company refused to pay and Tom’s wife sued the company to force payment.The TrialTestimony at the trial proved conclusively that Tom was legally intoxicated when he left the party. There was also proof that there was nothing in the policy about lack of coverage in the event of an accident due to intoxication.The Arguments at TrialThe insurance company’s attorneys argued that benefit provisions apply only to death due to accidents and that, although Tom appeared to have been in an accident, his death was due to his being intoxicated and therefore not an accident. They further argued that this concept was so logical that it did not need spelling out in the insurance policy. The estate’s attorneys argued that because the policy was silent about accidents due to intoxication, the benefit provision should apply regardless of the cause of the accident; the parties had a contract and all exclusions must be spelled out in the contract in order to be effective.Questions to DiscussWho do you think has the stronger argument, the insurance company or Tom’s estate? Why?
If you were the jury hearing this case, how would you decide? Why?
What do you think the rule regarding coverage of accidents due to use of drugs or excessive alcohol should be?
Requirements: perfect please

Hey there!Would you have time to answer the following question I received from m

Hey there!Would you have time to answer the following question I received from my Professor? This is what he has asked:Robert Milleryesterday at 1:24 PMJennifer:Overall, this is an excellent presentation. You mentioned there are various forms of agency relationships, what are they and what type of agent would Tacy be if hired as an independent contractor? Also, did you consider the difference in both contract and tort liability that falls to Clean based upon the type of relationship created? What are the differences?Rob Miller
Requirements:

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law multi-part question and need an exp

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
[A] Suppose that the following milestones apply to a hypothetical based on Brodgen v Metro Railway. Brogden supplies coal to Metro on a regular basis. On April 1, Brogden and Metro negotiated a draft concerning the supply of coal.
Suppose that the following transactions take place:
April 5: Brogden shipped but Metro rejected 75,000 tons of coal
May 5: Brogden shipped but Metro rejected 85,000 tons of coal
May 25: Brogden shipped and Metro received 630,000 tons of coal
June 2: Brodgen shipped and Metro received the delivery of 45,000 tons of coal
July 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 50,000 tons of coal
August 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 125,000 tons of coal
August 29: Brogden shipped and Metro received 750,000 tons of coal
[1] On what date, if any, does an implied contract between Brogden and Metro come into force? ________ (date) [ILO C1] (2 marks)
[2] What, if any, would be the contractual liability of Metro to Brogden? Answer in aggregate tons:_____ (number) [ILO B1] (2 marks)
[3] What effect, if any, did the event of June 2 have on that contractual liability? Explain in terms of implied contact theory in one sentence only on the lines provided:___________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________[ILO C1] (1 ½ marks)
[4a] Identify the theory of the cause of action from the branch “Contracts” for Brogden’s claim against Metro for non-contractual liability:_________________________________________ (max limit three words)[A1/C1] (1 mark)
[4b] Identify the basis of recovery under that theory:________________________________(max limit three words)[A1] (1 mark)
[5] Using data from [B3] below, determine damages payable using the above-identified theory & recovery basis:______________ (number)
[ILO B1] (2 marks)
[B] Witham tendered successfully for the supply of coal to the Great Northern over a period on one year. In his tender, Witham undertook to supply such quantities as Great Northern may order from time to time. Assume that the tender was on Feb 15, the winner was announced on March 15 and the obligations pursuant to the tender began on April 1. Suppose that on June 15, Witham informed Great Northern of intent to opt out and 8 days later Great Northern received the registered letter to that effect.. Suppose that Great Northern placed the following orders on Witham on the following dates:
Date of Order Coal (tons)
April 12
25,000
May 3
75,000
June 18
45,000
June 30
200,000
July 15
90,000
August 12
65,000
Sept 5
85,000
Sept 15
35,000
Oct 8 110,000
If in the tender the opt out notice period is stipulated as 60 days from date of the receipt by the tender awarder as evidenced by return receipt:
[1] On what date will obligations of the tender awardee cease pursuant to the opt out? ___________ (date) [ILO A1] (1 ½ marks)
[2] How many tons will the tender awardee be obligated to supply the tender awarder? ____________ (number) [ILO B2] (1 ½ marks)
[3] Assume that the tender awarder supplied no coal to the tender awardee and plans to sue the tender awarder. How much ordinary damages is the tender awarder likely to be awarded if, in 1873, the price of anthracite coal in the market (PM) was $4.27 but in the tender the price was stipulated contract price (PK) of $4.25 for that year.
Indicate the formula for ordinary damages (DO) = _______________________ [ILO A1] (1 marks) DO=$_______________ (number) [ILO B1]
(1 ½ marks)

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law test / quiz prep and need an explan

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law test / quiz prep and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
[A] Suppose that the following milestones apply to a hypothetical based on Brodgen v Metro Railway. Brogden supplies coal to Metro on a regular basis. On April 1, Brogden and Metro negotiated a draft concerning the supply of coal.
Suppose that the following transactions take place:
April 5: Brogden shipped but Metro rejected 75,000 tons of coal
May 5: Brogden shipped but Metro rejected 85,000 tons of coal
May 25: Brogden shipped and Metro received 630,000 tons of coal
June 2: Brodgen shipped and Metro received the delivery of 45,000 tons of coal
July 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 50,000 tons of coal
August 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 125,000 tons of coal
August 29: Brogden shipped and Metro received 750,000 tons of coal
[1] On what date, if any, does an implied contract between Brogden and Metro come into force? ________ (date) [ILO C1] (2 marks)
[2] What, if any, would be the contractual liability of Metro to Brogden? Answer in aggregate tons:_____ (number) [ILO B1] (2 marks)
[3] What effect, if any, did the event of June 2 have on that contractual liability? Explain in terms of implied contact theory in one sentence only on the lines provided:___________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________[ILO C1] (1 ½ marks)
[4a] Identify the theory of the cause of action from the branch “Contracts” for Brogden’s claim against Metro for non-contractual liability:_________________________________________ (max limit three words)[A1/C1] (1 mark)
[4b] Identify the basis of recovery under that theory:________________________________(max limit three words)[A1] (1 mark)
[5] Using data from [B3] below, determine damages payable using the above-identified theory & recovery basis:______________ (number)
[ILO B1] (2 marks)
[B] Witham tendered successfully for the supply of coal to the Great Northern over a period on one year. In his tender, Witham undertook to supply such quantities as Great Northern may order from time to time. Assume that the tender was on Feb 15, the winner was announced on March 15 and the obligations pursuant to the tender began on April 1. Suppose that on June 15, Witham informed Great Northern of intent to opt out and 8 days later Great Northern received the registered letter to that effect.. Suppose that Great Northern placed the following orders on Witham on the following dates:
Date of Order Coal (tons)
April 12
25,000
May 3
75,000
June 18
45,000
June 30
200,000
July 15
90,000
August 12
65,000
Sept 5
85,000
Sept 15
35,000
Oct 8 110,000
If in the tender the opt out notice period is stipulated as 60 days from date of the receipt by the tender awarder as evidenced by return receipt:
[1] On what date will obligations of the tender awardee cease pursuant to the opt out? ___________ (date) [ILO A1] (1 ½ marks)
[2] How many tons will the tender awardee be obligated to supply the tender awarder? ____________ (number) [ILO B2] (1 ½ marks)
[3] Assume that the tender awarder supplied no coal to the tender awardee and plans to sue the tender awarder. How much ordinary damages is the tender awarder likely to be awarded if, in 1873, the price of anthracite coal in the market (PM) was $4.27 but in the tender the price was stipulated contract price (PK) of $4.25 for that year.
Indicate the formula for ordinary damages (DO) = _______________________ [ILO A1] (1 marks) DO=$_______________ (number) [ILO B1]
(1 ½ marks)

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law project and need support to help me

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law project and need support to help me learn.
Each student will define a topic for a research project on business law and ethics that can be applied to the student’s area of business interest. This research paper is worth 65% of your final grade, so it’s importance should not be underestimated. Your paper must be well-thought-out and polished.
Your paper should be about 10 pages long, double spaced, and APA formatted.
The deliverables are as follows:
 The topic of the paper
 The outline of the paper
 The final draft of the research paper
 The formal presentation of the research paper (highlights only)

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an exp

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Must thoroughly discuss all aspects of question AND include laws, UCC articles etc that pertain to the case
Interpretation of Insurance Contract Terms
KLJ Insurance Co. issued an insurance policy to Allan Viola to cover his aircraft. One provision of the policy excluded coverage for a “resident spouse.” A different provision included coverage for “any passenger.” Allan was piloting the aircraft with his wife, Julie, as a passenger when the aircraft crashed. Allan was killed, and Julie was injured. At the time, Julie and Allan had been living together. Julie filed a suit in a federal district court to collect under the policy for her injuries. KLJ claimed that the policy clearly excluded Julie. Julie argued that the policy was ambiguous. What will the court decide? Why?
Here is a case dealing with an equally ambiguous term:
Tina Johnson worked as a sales and reservations supervisor in a Global Securities Corp. (GSC) office located in Philadelphia. At 10:00pm one evening, after she had completed her work shift, Johnson left her office and exited the building onto a covered walkway. While she stood on this walkway, her estranged husband fatally stabbed her. As a GSC employee, Johnson was covered by a group life insurance policy issued by Federal Life Assurance Co. of America. A provision of the policy, marked “Hazard F,” provided for a payment of $100,000 to the insured beneficiaries in the event of death resulting from “a felonious assault while on authorized business of [GSC].” The term “felonious assault” was defined to include murder. Federal Life refused to pay the proceeds of the policy to Johnson ‘s beneficiaries (her children) on the grounds that Johnson had not been “on authorized business” at the time of her death. The beneficiaries then sued Federal Life to recover the proceeds.
One of the questions posed by this case was at what instant following the conclusion of an employee’s work shift should separation from the employer’s authorized business be complete? The trial court held that this instant occurred when Johnson left the employer’s premises. Although she had left the building in which she worked, she was still on her employer’s premises at the time of the fatal stabbing. The appellate court agreed. One appellate court judge dissented, however, concluding that at the time of the tragedy, Johnson was on her own business, not on the business of her employer. Argue the merits of each conclusion. Which one do you think is the fairer? Why?
Is the phrase “on authorized business” sufficiently ambiguous for the court to construe the phrase against the insurer, Federal Life? Do you discern any ethical principle underlying the rule that ambiguous terms and phrases will be construed against the insurance company? Given the fact that both parties to an insurance contract must agree to the terms contained therein or no contract will be formed, do you think that it is fair to hold just one of the parties responsible for ambiguous terms or phrases?

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law multi-part question and need a refe

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law multi-part question and need a reference to help me learn.
There are two questions for this Contract. We are looking for the ability to read and comprehend the contract so the appropriate contract clause can be applied to the questions connected with each contract. In order to answer the contract fact scenario, you will also need to be able to identify the legal concept that is applicable to the situation described. This is an analysis so please treat it as such. Your personal opinion is not appropriate.
There are correct answers for the prompt. If a student discusses a different legal theory for answering the prompt, partial points will be given. In cases of complete or partial answers, textbook references are mandatory to support the remedy proposed by the student. A textbook reference that has no bearing on the remedy or legal arguments will be counted as “no text”. For example, if any contract has an issue of risk of loss, referencing the text on contract formation will not meet the requirement. The sections of the textbook that you have read contain all the information you need for this analysis.
Please remember to reference the applicable parts of the contract that you are using to answer the prompt.
This assignment is worth 40 points. A student will be given 6 points for the textbook reference; 6 points for the contract reference; with 27 points for the analysis itself. The remaining 1 point will be given as a spelling/grammar score. Following is the prompt.
Residential House Lease
The following prompt is based on the Residential House Lease found in the Contracts Module. Please reference the Lease by clause number as you answer the prompt. Remember to reference the textbook by chapter and section.
Essay (2 complete paragraphs with text references to support your answers)
Alecia, the landlord, refuses to fix a small leak in the roof that was there prior to the current tenant. Joe, the current tenant, has just discovered the leak after a heavy rain. The consequence is that black mold has been forming in the attic for quite some time. Joe still has significant time remaining on his lease. Joe has notified Alecia in writing by email of the mold and leak issue but has received no response. He is concerned about the premises becoming unsafe to live in. It has been 14 days since he emailed her his notification.
What are all of Joe’s options if Alecia declines to do the repairs?
Please discuss all remedies Joe may seek. Please remember to reference the lease and text to support your analysis.