Reply needed for this Discussion  The news source I chose was Fox News. As a ste

Reply needed for this Discussion 
The news source I chose was Fox News. As a steadfast moderate, I chose fox news because of its polarizing coverage. Their frame work mainly focuses more on socially conservative topics and they are a very hard right news broadcasting station. A good example to give you regarding its hard right opinions, on their website you can find Trumps speech regarding the riots that happened at the Capitol. Fox news did a live broadcast of Trump giving his thoughts on the matter and it frames the issue at hand, political violence. The way Trump delivers his speech framed political violence to be an awful thing and in his words, “Mob violence goes against everything I believe in and everything our movements stands for.” However, that being said, just moments before the riots at the Capitol, he in fact lit the flame and fueled the fire by voicing that supporters should continue to challenge the 2020 election results that gave President Joe Biden the win and take the fight to the Capitol. The fact that Fox News managed only to cover Trumps broadcast regarding his emotions towards the riots and how he does not support violence, clearly displays ideological bias to the right side. It’s hard to side with Fox News knowing their frame work only promotes a very hard right view trying to present Trump in a positive light when he clearly had an undeniable connection to the riots that broke out. Had they aired him giving his speech questioning the integrity of the election and stating the words “take fight to the Capitol”, I might have different views on Fox News. And of course, Trump stating “take fight to the Capitol”, Fox News will say that his statement was a “figure of speech” to help promote the right side views.
Below you will find the link to Trumps speech.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-post-impeachment-message-no-true-supporter
Instruction for the assignent
Once you have completed your original post, pick a peer’s post and read/view their source. In 150 words or more, respond by doing the following:
First, provide a link to YOUR source and tell them which side of the chart it is from.
Discuss how your source’s framing of the issue compares/contrasts with theirs. How did their source define the issue and the people involved versus yours?
Do you think their source’s bias was clearly on display? Do you agree/disagree with the source’s point of view? Why or why not?
My discussion (for the reference only)
New York Times Media’s Insights on Political Violence
I chose this link https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/us/politics/us-security-precautions.html for the media source from the left side of the bias chart. The New York Times media located on the left side of the bias chart portrays violence as the biggest problem. I will use this media source to discuss how media covers the issue of violence and also how media present the events regarding violence in sensationalist or ideological bias.
As noted earlier, one of the major causes of political violence is the greed for power; it is proved to be accurate as portrayed by the New York Times. As the congress democrats are still pursuing the impeachment action against Triumph for the second time, his followers are not showing any sign of despair even after a malicious attack on the united states Capitol the other week. Triumph’s supporters are not willing to back down from their protest for their supposed rights. Alternatively, the democrats in congress are not also ready to recede from impeaching Trump.
This article does not frame some people as good while others are bad because it explicitly explains that both teams fight for what they believe is right. However, both parties are doing this to gain authority and power to their side. Also, this source uses relevant pieces of evidence from the recent occurrences to present the issue of political violence. Therefore, the use of practical pieces of evidence limits all the grounds for ideological biases. Furthermore, this media source is right because it has made realize that there is much alternativeness that the United States can use to avoid such violence. It presents bias-free information without any form of propaganda, thus making this source a more authentic and reliable one instead of many other sources that are unreliable and full of bias and prejudice.
Reference
Can the U.S. avoid more political violence? (2021, January 12). The New York Times – Breaking News, US News, World News, and Videos. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/us/politics/us-security-precautions.html

Find an online article (news, magazine, journal, etc.) of interest that uses sta

Find an online article (news, magazine, journal, etc.) of interest that uses statistics to make its conclusion.
Share a link in this thread, and answer these questions about that article:
What is the premise and conclusion of the argument based on statistics?
Determine whether or not the argument uses any deceptive statistics.
Give your opinion on whether the argument has persuaded you. Explain why or not.
Determine the primary ways in which statistics or authority are used in your current position in developing persuasive arguments and provide examples here.

Discuss 3 aspects of the United States Constitution that apply to international

Discuss 3 aspects of the United States Constitution that apply to international law and policy. Review current events over the past 6 months, and discuss 3 actions taken by the United States government (i.e., trade negotiation, military engagement, humanitarian issues et al.), and whether the actions taken were constitutional or unconstitutional. 600WORDS

Discuss 3 aspects of the United States Constitution that apply to international

Discuss 3 aspects of the United States Constitution that apply to international law and policy. Review current events over the past 6 months, and discuss 3 actions taken by the United States government (i.e., trade negotiation, military engagement, humanitarian issues et al.), and whether the actions taken were constitutional or unconstitutional. 600WORDS

Discussion 1 | Episode 1 EPISODE ONE: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US Should doctors a

Discussion 1 | Episode 1 EPISODE ONE: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US
Should doctors and other health professionals take biological race into account when diagnosing and treating illness? Why? Can you think of a situation where thinking about race as biological might be misleading or have a negative effect? How would considering social race be different?
Tips:
Please start your Discussion with the Question so people know what you are discussing. 
Initial Post Due Friday 11:59 pm, Secondary Sunday at 11:59 pm
Look at the rubric below to see what I am looking for. 
There is no specific word count, but 200-500 words are probably adequate. 
Rubric: 
20 Points possible 
4 Points – Displays a great understanding of the concepts in the assignment
4 Points – Utilizes APA formatting
4 Points – Clear and concise writing with no errors in grammar, spelling, or context.
4 Points – Make a timely initial response.
4 Points – Make a timely and appropriate secondary response. (see tips)

Briefly trace the evolution of the constitutionality of same-sex marriage as a f

Briefly trace the evolution of the constitutionality of same-sex marriage as a fundamental right in the United States. You should include a review of state ballot initiatives and federal and state laws pertaining to marriage equality. Also, examine relevant state and federal law suits and court decisions as well as the constitutional basis for the rulings. You should include at least 5 major court cases and the relevant state and federal lawsuits.