Write an open letter to an identified individual who has appropriate responsibility for an area of nursing care/healthcare in the NHS UK.
The letter should set out an argument for a change with direct relevance to nursing care. You must consider service user points of view and you should demonstrate the following –
ILO 1. Appraise philosophical, and ethical values, historical, methodological and political factors that inform the basis of nursing across all fields.
ILO 2. Discuss and analyse the use of humanising frameworks as a value base and theory to guide practice and research.
ILO 3. Discuss and evaluate processes and factors that contribute to a person’s experience of feeling vulnerable and those that support empowerment, by exploring lived experiences of service users and health care workers to recognise excellence in practice and to propose improvements to nursing care.
ILO 4. Evaluate the process of maintaining personal and professional accountability when collaborating with service users, their families and carers and health care professionals.
Detailed plan attached.
Marking rubric attached.
Potential research attached.
Example essay attached (different recommendation)
Example essay of my recommendation (needs improving)
I want to improve dementia care in the acute hospital setting. This can be achieved by providing person centred care. Many factors need to change to make person centred care available, this needs to be understood by everyone in the Trust, including management.
Recommending the opening of a specialist dementia care unit for these changes to take place.
The example essay about cooling the hospitals is a top mark essay, the dementia example is not high marking but my topic area.
submitted the instructions in a document. i’ve bolded and underlined which policy you’ll be writing about. the purpose for the prohibition of tobacco adverts and how and or why is it impactful.
Most healthcare focused departments utilize technology for data collection, storage, analysis, and reporting of information. For this assignment, select a healthcare organization or hospital department and
Describe the organization or hospital department.
Identify types of information collected, including format and approximate volume.
Compare and contrast three data storage or databases used by the department.
Identify and describe at least three communication technologies (for example a VPN) and how they are used in your selected organization or department.
Identify and describe three internet technologies (for example, intranet) and explain how they are used in your organization or department.
Identify and summarize a minimum of four Joint Commission standards related to health information technology relevant to a health information management department or another hospital department. To access The Joint Commission Standards Manual, follow the steps below:
From the homepage of the University of Arizona Global Campus Library, click on Find Articles & More in the purple bar near the top of the page. Next, take the following steps:
Click on Databases by Subject
Click on Health & Medicine
Click on Joint Commission Edition for the Standards manual.
Identify and advocate information operability between two hospital departments relative to patient information.
Assess how the organization or department corrects department data utilized by other departments.
The Health Information Technology assignment
Must be five to six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
University name (University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Must use at least three sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table (Links to an external site.)offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.
Individuals with personality disorders often find it difficult to overcome the enduring patterns of thought and behavior that they have thus far experienced and functioned with in daily life. Even when patients are aware that personality-related issues are causing significant distress and functional impairment and are open to counseling, treatment can be challenging for both the patient and the therapist. For this Assignment, you examine specific personality disorders and consider therapeutic approaches you might use with clients.
Select one of the personality disorders from the DSM-5-TR (e.g., paranoid, antisocial, narcissistic). Then, select a therapy modality (individual, family, or group) that you might use to treat a client with the disorder you selected.
Briefly describe the personality disorder you selected, including the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria.
Explain a therapeutic approach and a modality you might use to treat a client presenting with this disorder. Explain why you selected the approach and modality, justifying their appropriateness.
Next, briefly explain what a therapeutic relationship is in psychiatry. Explain how you would share your diagnosis of this disorder with the client in order to avoid damaging the therapeutic relationship. Compare the differences in how you would share your diagnosis with an individual, a family, and in a group session.
Support your response with specific example, at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly.
1.) Why did you want to get your terminal degree and was it what you anticipated?
2.) What was the biggest challenge along the way and what was your area of greatest learning (aka your Aha moment)?
3. ) What have you learned about yourself in the pursuit of a DNP?
Summer Break is fast approaching, and you are thrilled to know that your spring graduate semester in nursing school is almost completed. As you begin to prepare to enjoy the time off, you realize that you have been invited to a cookout celebration at your professor’s home. You decide to RSVP “yes” and look forward to the party. As you enter the house, much to your surprise, the guests include not only your classmates, but all the nursing theorists that you have studied over this semester (Sr. Roy, Martha Rogers, Betty Neuman, Jean Watson, Dorothy Orem, etc.). These special guests are thrilled to meet you and pleased to know that you are just finishing a course in which you learned all about their theories.
Your task for this discussion is to mingle among the guests, joining conversations between and among different people who are there. Pick a theorist and describe a “hot topic” you discussed with your theorists at the party.
APA style, minimum of 2 peer reviewed references less than 5 years old.
Choose a current healthcare trend or cultural issue impacting the delivery of quality healthcare services. What are the factors influencing the topic of your discussion. Provide recommendations to make improvements for better coordination of care services amidst changing healthcare trends. Develop a 10-page paper with the following section headings:
1 – Issue/Topic Introduction (a minimum of TWO well-developed paragraphs introducing the reader to the issue you will discuss and why you chose to focus on it)
2 – Issue/Topic Background (minimum of 2-3 paragraphs explaining where the chosen issue is stemming from and how it impacts healthcare delivery; use journal articles or credible websites for this section)
3 – Issue/Topic Research – find out why this happening? What is causing this issue to become a glaring problem in the delivery of quality health services? What do research results on this selected issue reveal? (at least 2-3 solid pages using ONLY journal articles from peer-reviewed sources; your references will be checked for this)
4 – Recommendations/Suggestions (at least 1-2 pages; these MUST include any process or policy development or changes)
5 – Conclusion (at least 1-2 substantive paragraphs summarizing your content and wrapping up any thoughts)
The paper should follow APA 7 formatting guidelines. Please visit the Purdue OWL website to gain an understanding of the APA 7 writing and formatting style. Following the Purdue OWL examples, include in your final paper:
Abstract (1-2 substantive paragraphs)
Body (include each of the FIVE sections mentioned above)
References List (be sure that all in-text citations have a complete reference list citation to support credibility in your work).
Write a 3-4 page reflection (typed, double spaced, Times New Roman 12 point font)
• What? Analyze your current ability to function as an effective pharmacist member of the healthcare team.
• So What? Identify the areas where you have significant strengths and those where you need improvement.
• Now What? Formulate a plan for your personal growth and development toward team readiness over the next 10 months.
Please go strictly by the provided Rubrics. I need a comprehensive purpose statement/introduction and conclusion. Three credible sources within five years, at least one source from the internal resource provided. Please do not include the text as a reference. APA 7 style, running heads with page numbers . 2 pages
Assessment Task 1 – Literature Review
and using the PICO method and CASP tool
In this assessment task students are required to conduct a review of the current literature using a systematic approach. There will be several key sections to this assessment task, including creation of a flow chart that represents how the literature search was conducted including the inclusion / exclusion criteria, the final selected papers (10-12) represented in a table format highlighting the following aspects; author/year/country, methodology, participants, key findings, and a detailed description of the key findings of the selected papers.
Purpose: To develop and demonstrate skills related to reviewing literature using a systematic approach.
Description: Students will be required to choose a research topic of interest and conduct a review of the literature. Students are required to complete a written piece of work with the following headings:
Introduction or Background: 1-2 paragraphs that introduces the reader to the topic of interest. Older references may be used here to give context to the topic.
Aim or Purpose: 1-2 sentences that succinctly gives the aim or purpose of the literature review.
Method: 2-3 paragraphs that includes a summary of the Search Strategy, quality appraisal tool used and a Flow chart of the literature search.
Results: Summary Table of Selected literature (10-12 articles), Quality appraisal scores and 1-2 paragraphs summarising the Key findings. This may include the demographics/qualities of the selected articles.
Discussion: 3-4 paragraphs discussing the findings of the articles and any commonalities or themes identified between them. This could also include any limitations of the review and/or any recommendations for future work in the area.
Conclusion: 1 short paragraph that summarises the findings of the review.
Reference list: Following correct formatting and citations throughout the review. APA7th
Word limit: 2000 words. Note: Tables, figures and references will not count towards this word count limit