Final, W8, Question Write an essay (1200 words) on the following question: Discu

Final, W8, Question
Write an essay (1200 words) on the following question:
Discuss three major challenges in the Asia-Pacific region. Explain the origins, processes, and possible consequences of your selected cases.
Course Objectives
After successfully completing this course, you will be able to:
CO1: Demonstrate the nature of E. Asian security dilemmas.
CO2: Apply specific historical developments to the particular manner in which modern Asian states evolved.
CO3: Differentiate the various cultural and social norms that underlie Asian political discourse.
CO4: Distinguish the strengths and weaknesses of Asian political and economic institutions.
CO5: Assess the role of the developmental state in Asian economic development.

Question 1 (50 points) Using 500-700 words discuss in detail the two primary h

Question 1 (50 points)

Using 500-700 words discuss in detail the two primary historical schools of thought presented in this week’s lesson pertaining to criminology i.e., the classical and positivist schools of criminology. No direct quotes should be utilized in the response.
Note: The essay response given should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing in accordance with current APA standards. The essay response is to include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources listed in proper APA format with in-text citation(s) in proper APA format. In-text citations are to correspond to a source in proper APA format listed after the essay response.
Question 2 (50 points)

Using 500-700 words discuss in detail subcultural theory as it relates to delinquency and crime. Further briefly without using quotes give an overview of this article i.e., Nwalozie, C. J. (2015). Rethinking subculture and subcultural theory in the study of youth crime – A theoretical discourse. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 1-16.
Note: The essay response given should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing in accordance with current APA standards. The essay response is to include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources listed in proper APA format with in-text citation(s) in proper APA format. In-text citations are to correspond to a source in proper APA format listed after the essay response.

D‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ear Writer, this is the continuation of what we have starte

D‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ear Writer, this is the continuation of what we have started to work on for the first chapter of the dissertation, this is the second chapter, please do refer to the files I have attached on the previous work ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍(1st Chapter) as well as the guidelines discussed over there and on the messages section. Thank you and will look forward to a satisfactory work yet again to even continue working together for the 3rd chapter‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

-​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ Take all topics from the readings I will attach and brin

-​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ Take all topics from the readings I will attach and bring them together to provide an answer. Do not rely on one week only.
– Thesis question: (dont answer what you wish the question were) make sure the first line states your position: i will argue X is a good/bad thing for X Y Z reasons due to X Y Z (make it clear – no surprises)
– Make him know everything from the first paragraph.
– Since it’s a 2000 word research essay, please make sure you have 2 main arguments and expand on them. I got a B last semester because I had 3 main arguments and according to him, the main arguments were underdeveloped because I had too many ideas.
– Evidence to support argument is everything we have done over the past weeks. Use the readings and take the theories and history and apply it to a contemporary event. (Always use examples not mentione​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​d in his readings, he likes it when we apply our theories to things that are happening around us, he doesn’t care what the example are, but he likes people that are creative when explaining, he specifically asked me to ‘apply what you’ve learned to further cases, extend theoretical perspective in some direction and offer innovative/insightful critique’
– Textual evidence (readings), Empirical evidence (contemporary event in the world)
– Think of these essay in terms of structure (like an hour glass) start broad then get into something specific that you can argue then at the end broaden it up and make a bigger comment about the world (why does this matter? Why should we care? What are the implications? Should we study/practice/understand diplomacy differently?
– What is expected of me:
1. Analytical depth
2. Critical​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ engagement

I​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ supply some potential literature sources that are adequa

I​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ supply some potential literature sources that are adequate for this essay, however they don’t neces​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​sarily have to be used (not all of them) and some other not mentioned can be used as well if needed​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.

I​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ supply some potential literature sources that are adequa

I​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ supply some potential literature sources that are adequate for this essay, however they don’t neces​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​sarily have to be used (not all of them) and some other not mentioned can be used as well if needed​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.

-​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ Take all topics from the readings I will attach and brin

-​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ Take all topics from the readings I will attach and bring them together to provide an answer. Do not rely on one week only.
– Thesis question: (dont answer what you wish the question were) make sure the first line states your position: i will argue X is a good/bad thing for X Y Z reasons due to X Y Z (make it clear – no surprises)
– Make him know everything from the first paragraph.
– Since it’s a 2000 word research essay, please make sure you have 2 main arguments and expand on them. I got a B last semester because I had 3 main arguments and according to him, the main arguments were underdeveloped because I had too many ideas.
– Evidence to support argument is everything we have done over the past weeks. Use the readings and take the theories and history and apply it to a contemporary event. (Always use examples not mentione​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​d in his readings, he likes it when we apply our theories to things that are happening around us, he doesn’t care what the example are, but he likes people that are creative when explaining, he specifically asked me to ‘apply what you’ve learned to further cases, extend theoretical perspective in some direction and offer innovative/insightful critique’
– Textual evidence (readings), Empirical evidence (contemporary event in the world)
– Think of these essay in terms of structure (like an hour glass) start broad then get into something specific that you can argue then at the end broaden it up and make a bigger comment about the world (why does this matter? Why should we care? What are the implications? Should we study/practice/understand diplomacy differently?
– What is expected of me:
1. Analytical depth
2. Critical​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ engagement